4.1 Article

An Electrophysiological Biomarker That May Predict Treatment Response to ECT

期刊

JOURNAL OF ECT
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 95-102

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000557

关键词

electroconvulsive therapy; major depressive disorder; biomarker; electroencephalography

资金

  1. [MH40159]
  2. [MH41803]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most effective treatment for major depression but also carries risk of cognitive side effects. The ability to predict whether treatment will be effective before initiation of treatment could significantly improve quality of care, reduce suffering, and diminish costs. We sought to carry out a comprehensive and definitive study of the relationship between the background electroencephalography (EEG) and therapeutic response to ECT. Methods Twenty-one channel resting EEG was collected pre-ECT and 2 to 3 days after ECT course from 2 separate data sets, one to develop an EEG model of therapeutic response (n = 30) and a second to test this model (n = 40). A 3-way principal components analysis was applied and coherence and spectral amplitude across 6 frequency bands were examined. The primary outcome measure was the Montgomery-Asberg Rating Scale (MADRS). Results Four patterns of amplitude and coherence along with baseline MADRS score accounted for 85% of the variance in posttreatment course MADRS score in study 1 (R-2 = 0.85, F = 11.7, P < 0.0002) and 53% of the variance in MADRS score in study 2 (R-2 = 0.53, F = 5.5, P < 0.003). Greater pre-ECT course anterior delta coherence accounted for the majority of variance in therapeutic response (study 1: R-2 = 0.44, P = 0.01; study 2: R-2 = 0.16, P = 0.008). Conclusions These results suggest a putative electrophysiological biomarker that can predict therapeutic response before a course of ECT. Greater baseline anterior delta coherence is significantly associated with a better subsequent therapeutic response and could be indicative of intact circuitry allowing for improved seizure propagation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据