4.5 Article

Effects of surface charge and flexibility of liposomes on dermal drug delivery

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2019.01.028

关键词

Liposomal drug delivery system; Dermal application; Intradermal penetration; Skin disease

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [18K14960]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K14960] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dermal drug delivery is noninvasive and improves patient's quality of life. However, the stratum corneum and tight junctions in the granular layer are barriers that impede the delivery of hydrophilic macromolecules. For use in the treatment of allergic diseases, the drug must be delivered to deep sites within the skin, where immune-competent cells are located. Several liposome preparations have been reported to improve dermal drug delivery. However, there are few systematic reports on intradermal penetration of liposomes that focused on liposomal characteristics. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the characteristics of liposomes, which facilitates effective intradermal penetration, by focusing on their surface charge and structural flexibility. Liposomes with various surface charges and structures were prepared and their physical properties, flexibility, intradermal penetration, cytotoxicity, skin irritation, and intracellular uptake ability were evaluated. Three types of 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC)/cholesterol-based cationic, neutral, and anionic liposomes and another anionic 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DOPE)/cholesteryl hemisuccinate (CHEMS) liposome were tested. Cellular uptake and intradermal penetration of liposomes were affected by surface charge and flexibility. DOPE/CHEMS liposome showed the most effective intradermal penetration and lowest skin irritation induction. In conclusion, the combination of negative surface charge and flexible structure is required for effective dermal drug delivery using liposomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据