4.6 Review

Periodontitis as a risk factor for peri-implantitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 1-10

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.09.010

关键词

Periodontal diseases; Peri-implantitis; Periodontitis; Risk factors

资金

  1. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To evaluate the scientific evidence from observational studies concerning the risk of peri-implantitis development in periodontally-compromised patients. Source: The search was carried out in Medline, via PubMed, and the Cochrane Library up to March 2018. Study selection: Clinical studies reporting data on periodontitis and peri-implantitis, with confirmed diagnosis of peri-implantitis based on specific parameters (peri-implant probing depth and peri-implant bleeding on probing) and with evaluations of implants with at least 1 year of function were selected. Data: Nineteen articles were included; only two did not show any association between periodontitis and peri-implantitis. Quality analysis of the articles revealed a low risk of bias in most of the studies. Meta-analyses by study design on patient data showed that patients with periodontitis had a 2.29 higher risk of peri-implantitis than patients without periodontitis (95% CI: 1.34-3.24). However, the effect estimate was OR 5.15 (95% CI: -3.35; 13.65; I2: 0%, p=0.887) for cohort studies. A subgroup analysis showed a significant association between peri-implantitis and chronic periodontitis (patient based data: OR=2.89, 95% CI: 1.79-4.00). Meta-analysis by study design on implant data showed that implants in individuals with periodontitis had 2.15 higher chances of having peri-implantitis (95% CI: 1.10; 3.21). However, the effect estimate was OR 3.24 (95% CI: -0.05; 6.53) for cohort studies. Conclusions: This systematic review showed that diagnosis or history of periodontitis was associated with the occurrence of peri-implantitis. However, this association was not observed when only the cohort studies were analyzed. Results should be evaluated with caution due to heterogeneity among the included primary studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据