4.5 Article

Electrochemotherapy - A locoregional therapy with well-established palliative effect in patient with large recurrent lesion of head and neck

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
卷 47, 期 1, 页码 41-46

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.10.014

关键词

Electrochemotherapy; Head and neck cancer; Palliation; Supportive care; Quality of life

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is a well established treatment strategy for skin tumors of different histology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of electrochemotherapy in the palliative setting in patients with head and neck malignancies, already treated with surgery and/or radio-chemotherapy with no other therapeutic option. Methods: Thirty-six patients with a loco-regional M0/M1 relapse with no other therapeutic option not suitable for a cure with a radical intent by surgery or RT and not suitable for systemic therapy and/or already treated with it, were admitted to electrochemotherapy (ECT) protocol treatment. ECT was performed according ESOPE guidelines. Clinical features, treatment response, and adverse effects were evaluated 15, 30 days and then every months after the treatment. Results: An overall response of 100% was observed. Only 3 patients out 36 showed a CR. Overall survival probability at 12 months was 41.6% (median OS: 9 months). In all patient, an improvement of quality of life in terms of pain, bleeding events were observed, while need for medical assistance or dressing was significantly reduced 1 month after electrochemotherapy (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Electrochemotherapy is an effective palliative treatment of non-resectable head and neck malignancies able. Due to the ECT limited side effects, its early use would be desirable to obtain a better local control of the disease and improve quality of life of patients. (C) 2018 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据