4.4 Article

Comparison of Commonly Used Questionnaires to Identify Obstructive Sleep Apnea in a High-Risk Population

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SLEEP MEDICINE
卷 14, 期 12, 页码 2057-2064

出版社

AMER ACAD SLEEP MEDICINE
DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.7536

关键词

diabetes; heart failure; hypertension; obesity; sleep apnea questionnaires

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objectives: Sleep apnea is associated with adverse health outcomes. Despite being an important comorbidity in obesity, type 2 diabetes, heart failure, and resistant hypertension, it is underdiagnosed in these patient groups. An inexpensive and readily accessible sleep apnea screening tool would help address this problem. We sought to compare three commonly used screening tools. Methods: We recruited 812 patients who had not previously been investigated for sleep apnea from our institution's diabetes (n = 512), obesity (n = 129), resistant hypertension (n = 74) and heart failure (n = 43) clinics. Patients completed three frequently used sleep apnea screening questionnaires (STOP-BANG, Berlin, and OSA50). A total of 758 patients had a valid (>4 hours' duration) level 3 home sleep study. Studies were reported by a sleep physician and were deemed positive if they recorded a respiratory event index (REI) >= 15 events/h. Results: The 758 patients with valid sleep studies were age 59 +/- 11 years and 63% were male. A total of 38% of patients had a positive test. The respective sensitivities and specificities of the screening questionnaires at the recommended screening thresholds (REI >= 15 events/h) were STOP-BANG >= 3 (95% and 19%), STOP-BANG >= 5 (60% and 69%), Berlin (75% and 38%), and OSA50 (88% and 21%). We identified six independent predictors (age, sex, body mass index, neck circumference, snoring >= 3 days per week, observed apnea >= 3 days per week). However, combining these factors was no better than the STOP-BANG in predicting sleep apnea. All patients with a STOP-BANG <3 had an REI <30 events/h. Conclusions: There is a high prevalence of undiagnosed symptomatic sleep apnea in high-risk patient groups. The STOP-BANG questionnaire appeared superior, though all questionnaires had significant limitations. Incorporation of STOP-BANG >= 3 in this high-risk population might reduce the need for sleep testing in a resource-constrained setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据