4.4 Article

Effect of Interior Loop Length on the Thermal Stability and pKa of i-Motif DNA

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 54, 期 6, 页码 1364-1370

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi5014722

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation under Mississippi EPSCoR [EPS-0903787]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R15 CA173667-01A1]
  3. Office Of The Director
  4. EPSCoR [0903787] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The four-stranded i-motif (iM) conformation of cytosine-rich DNA is important in a wide variety of biochemical systems ranging from its use in nanomaterials to a potential role in oncogene regulation. An iM is stabilized by acidic pH that allows hemiprotonated cytidines to form a C center dot C+ base pair. Fundamental studies that aim to understand how the lengths of loops connecting the protonated C center dot C+ pairs affect intramolecular iM physical properties are described here. We characterized both the thermal stability and the pK(a) of intramolecular iMs with differing loop lengths, in both dilute solutions and solutions containing molecular crowding agents. Our results showed that intramolecular iMs with longer central loops form at pHs and temperatures higher than those of iMs with longer outer loops. Our studies also showed that increases in thermal stability of iMs when molecular crowding agents are present are dependent on the loop that is lengthened. However, the increase in pK(a) for iMs when molecular crowding agents are present is insensitive to loop length. Importantly, we also determined the proton activity of solutions containing high concentrations of molecular crowding agents to ascertain whether the increase in pK(a) of an iM is caused by alteration of this activity in buffered solutions. We determined that crowding agents alone increase the apparent pK(a) of a number of small molecules as well as iMs but that increases to iM pK(a) were greater than that expected from a shift in proton activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据