4.8 Article

Thirty-eight-negative kinase 1 mediates trauma-induced intestinal injury and multi-organ failure

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 128, 期 11, 页码 5056-5072

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI97912

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG [AZ. 96/1-3, STE 2467/1-1, KL 2544/1-2, EI792/6-1]
  2. Forschungskern SyStaR
  3. Bohringer Ingelheim Ulm University Biocenter
  4. German Cancer Aid
  5. Fritz-Thyssen Foundation [2015-00363]
  6. NDIMED-Ver-bund PancChip
  7. Collaborative Research Center [1149]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dysregulated intestinal epithelial apoptosis initiates gut injury, alters the intestinal barrier, and can facilitate bacterial translocation leading to a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and/or multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). A variety of gastrointestinal disorders, including inflammatory bowel disease, have been linked to intestinal apoptosis. Similarly, intestinal hyperpermeability and gut failure occur in critically ill patients, putting the gut at the center of SIRS pathology. Regulation of apoptosis and immune-modulatory functions have been ascribed to Thirty-eight-negative kinase 1 (TNK1), whose activity is regulated merely by expression. We investigated the effect of TNK1 on intestinal integrity and its role in MODS. TNK1 expression induced crypt-specific apoptosis, leading to bacterial translocation, subsequent septic shock, and early death. Mechanistically, TNK1 expression in vivo resulted in STAT3 phosphorylation, nuclear translocation of p65, and release of IL-6 and TNF-alpha. A TNF-alpha neutralizing antibody partially blocked development of intestinal damage. Conversely, gut-specific deletion of TNK1 protected the intestinal mucosa from experimental colitis and prevented cytokine release in the gut. Finally, TNK1 was found to be deregulated in the gut in murine and porcine trauma models and human inflammatory bowel disease. Thus, TNK1 might be a target during MODS to prevent damage in several organs, notably the gut.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据