4.8 Article

Antisense STAT3 inhibitor decreases viability of myelodysplastic and leukemic stem cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 128, 期 12, 页码 5479-5488

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI120156

关键词

-

资金

  1. Paul Calabresi NIH K12 award
  2. NIH [K01DK105134, P30CA01330, R01 HL13948701A1, R01 DK103961]
  3. Einstein Training Program in Stem Cell Research from the Empire State Stem Cell Fund through New York State Department of Health [C30292GG]
  4. Leukemia Lymphoma Society
  5. Evans Foundation Grant
  6. Bloodwise (UK)
  7. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [K12CA132783, R01CA230756] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [K01DK105134, R01DK103961] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. Veterans Affairs [I01CX000114] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are associated with disease-initiating stem cells that are not eliminated by conventional therapies. Transcriptomic analysis of stem and progenitor populations in MDS and AML demonstrated overexpression of STAT3 that was validated in an independent cohort. STAT3 overexpression was predictive of a shorter survival and worse clinical features in a large MDS cohort. High STAT3 expression signature in MDS CD34(+) cells was similar to known preleukemic gene signatures. Functionally, STAT3 inhibition by a clinical, antisense oligonucleotide, AZD9150, led to reduced viability and increased apoptosis in leukemic cell lines. AZD9150 was rapidly incorporated by primary MDS/AML stem and progenitor cells and led to increased hematopoietic differentiation. STAT3 knockdown also impaired leukemic growth in vivo and led to decreased expression of MCL1 and other oncogenic genes in malignant cells. These studies demonstrate that STAT3 is an adverse prognostic factor in MDS/AML and provide a preclinical rationale for studies using AZD9150 in these diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据