4.8 Article

In vivo hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy ameliorates murine thalassemia intermedia

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 129, 期 2, 页码 598-615

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI122836

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R21CA193077, R01HL128288]
  2. Wings of Karen Foundation
  3. Marsha Rivkin Foundation
  4. Cooley's Anemia Foundation
  5. Foundation of the Hellenic Society of Hematology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current thalassemia gene therapy protocols require the collection of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs), in vitro culture, lentivirus vector transduction, and retransplantation into myeloablated patients. Because of cost and technical complexity, it is unlikely that such protocols will be applicable in developing countries, where the greatest demand for a beta-thalassemia therapy lies. We have developed a simple in vivo HSPC gene therapy approach that involves HSPC mobilization and an intravenous injection of integrating HDAd5/35++ vectors. Transduced HSPCs homed back to the bone marrow, where they persisted long-term. HDAd5/35++ vectors for in vivo gene therapy of thalassemia had a unique capsid that targeted primitive HSPCs through human CD46, a relatively safe SB100X transposase-based integration machinery, a micro-LCR-driven gamma-globin gene, and an MGMT(P140K) system that allowed for increasing the therapeutic effect by short-term treatment with low-dose O-6-benzylguanine plus bis-chloroethylnitrosourea. We showed in healthy human CD46-transgenic mice and in a mouse model of thalassemia intermedia that our in vivo approach resulted in stable gamma-globin expression in the majority of circulating red blood cells. The high marking frequency was maintained in secondary recipients. In the thalassemia model, a near-complete phenotypic correction was achieved. The treatment was well tolerated. This cost-efficient and portable approach could permit a broader clinical application of thalassemia gene therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据