4.7 Article

Methanol production via direct carbon dioxide hydrogenation using hydrogen from photocatalytic water splitting: Process development and techno-economic analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 208, 期 -, 页码 1446-1458

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.132

关键词

Methanol production; Carbon dioxide utilization; Membrane separation; Water splitting; Solar to chemicals; Optimization

资金

  1. SABIC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we demonstrate the process and economic viability of a new production route for methanol utilizing captured CO2 and H-2 produced from renewable, photocatalytic water splitting. Initial assessments of H-2 production from this approach revealed a low-cost potential through inexpensive feedstock, but with one major drawback. Simultaneous production of H-2 and O-2 increases the risk of forming an explosive mixture. In our previous work, we identified membrane-based processes to safely recover the H-2 product. To reduce the H-2 capture costs, we developed a conceptual process comprised of integrated facilities to produce methanol while solving the flammability constraints. The first unit supplies captured CO2, which is used as a raw material and a diluent to recover H-2 from the photocatalytic reactors. The tertiary mixture (H-2/O-2/CO2) is safely processed in an optimized membrane-based separation plant to produce a 3:1 H-2 and CO2 mixture. This binary mixture is then used as feedstock for methanol production via direct CO2 hydrogenation. Based on a detailed economic analysis, the break-even value of the methanol produced is higher than the current market price. The main drivers for the high cost are the separation plant and the feedstock costs of CO2. The best-case scenario (for the selected parameters), where the plant lifetime is 30 years with 0.060 $/kWh electricity price and 0.020 $/kg CO2 cost, has a break-even value for methanol at 0.96 $/kg. Based on a target solar-to-hydrogen efficiency of 10% in the photocatalytic reactor, the gross energy efficiency of the process was 6.25%. As a final element, we compared our process with alternative renewable methanol synthesis route from the literature to highlight the differences in electrochemical and thermochemical approaches. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据