4.7 Article

Do CCSD and approximate CCSD-F12 variants converge to the same basis set limits? The case of atomization energies

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 149, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5048665

关键词

-

资金

  1. Israel Science Foundation [1358/15]
  2. Minerva Foundation, Munich, Germany
  3. Helen and Martin Kimmel Center for Molecular Design
  4. estate of Emile Mimran
  5. Feinberg Graduate School (WIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While the title question is a clear yes from purely theoretical arguments, the case is less clear for practical calculations with finite (one-particle) basis sets. To shed further light on this issue, the convergence to the basis set limit of CCSD (coupled cluster theory with all single and double excitations) and of different approximate implementations of CCSD-F12 (explicitly correlated CCSD) has been investigated in detail for the W4-17 thermochemical benchmark. Near the CBS ([1-particle] complete basis set) limit, CCSD and CCSD(F12*) agree to within their respective uncertainties (about +/- 0.04 kcal/mol) due to residual basis set incompleteness error, but a nontrivial difference remains between CCSD-F12b and CCSD(F12*), which is roughly proportional to the degree of static correlation. The observed basis set convergence behavior results from the superposition of a rapidly converging, attractive, CCSD[F12]-CCSD-F12b difference (consisting mostly of third-order terms) and a more slowly converging, repulsive, fourth-order difference between CCSD(F12*) and CCSD[F12]. For accurate thermochemistry, we recommend CCSD(F12*) over CCSD-F12b if at all possible. There are some indications that the nZaPa family of basis sets exhibits somewhat smoother convergence than the correlation consistent family. Published by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据