4.7 Article

Gaussian process based optimization of molecular geometries using statistically sampled energy surfaces from quantum Monte Carlo

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 149, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.5040584

关键词

-

资金

  1. Predictive Theory and Modeling for Materials and Chemical Science program by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences
  2. Exascale Computing Project [17-SC-20-SC]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  4. National Nuclear Security Administration
  5. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, as part of the Computational Materials Sciences Program [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  6. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  7. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Optimization of atomic coordinates and lattice parameters remains a significant challenge to the wide use of stochastic electronic structure methods such as quantum Monte Carlo (QMC). Measurements of the forces and stress tensor by these methods contain statistical errors, challenging conventional gradient-based numerical optimization methods that assume deterministic results. Additionally, forces are not yet available for some methods, wavefunctions, and basis sets and when available may be expensive to compute to sufficiently high statistical accuracy near energy minima, where the energy surfaces are flat. Here, we explore the use of Gaussian process based techniques to sample the energy surfaces and reduce sensitivity to the statistical nature of the problem. We utilize Latin hypercube sampling, with the number of sampled energy points scaling quadratically with the number of optimized parameters. We show these techniques may be successfully applied to systems consisting of tens of parameters, demonstrating QMC optimization of a benzene molecule starting from a randomly perturbed, broken symmetry geometry. Published by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据