4.7 Article

Variational reduced density matrix method in the doubly occupied configuration interaction space using three-particle N-representability conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 149, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5056247

关键词

-

资金

  1. Universidad de Buenos Aires [20020150100157BA]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas [PIP 11220130100377CO, PIP 11220130100311CO, 11220150100442CO, 2013-1401-PCB]
  3. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica, Argentina [PICT-201-0381]
  4. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad
  5. European regional development fund (FEDER) [FIS2015-63770-P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ground-state energies and two-particle reduced density matrices (2-RDMs) corresponding to N-particle systems are computed variationally within the doubly occupied configuration interaction (DOCI) space by constraining the 2-RDM to satisfy a complete set of three-particle N-representability conditions known as three-positivity conditions. These conditions are derived and implemented in the variational calculation of the 2-RDM with standard semidefinite programming algorithms. Ground state energies and 2-RDMs are computed for N-2, CO, CN-, and NO+ molecules at both equilibrium and nonequilibrium geometries as well as for pairing models at different repulsive interaction strengths. The results from the full three-positivity conditions are compared with those from the exact DOCI method and with approximated 2-RDM variational ones obtained within two-positivity and two-positivity plus a subset of three-positivity conditions, as recently reported [D. R. Alcoba et al., J. Chem. Phys. 148, 024105 (2018) and A. Rubio-Garcia et al., J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14, 4183 (2018)]. The accuracy of these numerical determinations and their low computational cost demonstrate the usefulness of the three-particle variational constraints within the DOCI framework. Published by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据