4.7 Article

The quantum mechanics-based polarizable force field for water simulations

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 149, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.5042658

关键词

-

资金

  1. Computational Materials Sciences Program - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC00014607]
  2. National Science Foundation [ACI-1548562]
  3. NSF [CBET 1512759]
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1512759] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report here a new force field for water based solely on quantum mechanics (QM) calculations with no empirical data. The QM was at a high level, coupled cluster single double triple, for all orientations and distances for water dimer plus X3LYP density functional theory (DFT) on 19 larger water clusters. In addition, we included charge and polarization based on the polarizable charge equilibration method and nonbond interactions from DFT-D3 calculations on the H-2 and O-2 crystal. This model, denoted as RexPoN, provides quite excellent agreement with experimental (expr) data for the solid and liquid phase of water: T-melt = 273.3 K (expr = 273.15 K) and properties at 298 K: Delta H-vap = 10.36 kcal/mol (expr = 10.52), density = 0.9965 gr/cm(3) (expr = 0.9965), entropy = 68.4 (J/mol)/K (expr = 69.9), dielectric constant = 76.1 (expr = 78.4), and ln D-s (self-diffusion coef) = -10.08 (expr = -11.24). Such an accurate force field for water will, we believe, be useful for full solvent calculations of electrocatalysis, where we can restrict QM water to just the first one or two layers involving reactions, using RexPoN to provide the polarization for a more distant solvent. Also, RexPoN may provide a better description of the solvent for proteins, DNA, polymers, and inorganic systems for applications to biomolecular, pharma, electrocatalysis (fuel cells and water splitting), and batteries where interaction with explicit water molecules plays a significant role. Published by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据