4.7 Article

Effects of nebulized N-acetylcystein on the expression of HMGB1 and RAGE in rats with hyperoxia-induced lung injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 234, 期 7, 页码 10547-10553

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.27724

关键词

high mobility group box 1; hyperoxia-induced lung injury; N-acetylcysteine; receptor for advanced glycation end product

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveTo investigate the role of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) and receptor for advanced glycation end product (RAGE) in the lungs of hyperoxia-induced rats and the effect of N-acetlycystein (NAC). MethodsA model of hyperoxic lung injury was established, rats in the NAC intervention, and control, hyperoxia group were given nebulized NAC aerosol, nebulized same volume of saline once a day for 7 consecutive days, respectively. Wet/dry (W/D) ratio of the lungs was determined to evaluate the edema of the lung tissues. Conventional hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining was used to observe the pathological changes of lung tissues. Immunohistochemical staining was used to investigate the expression of HMGB1 and RAGE in the lung tissues. Quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and western blot analysis were used to measured the changes in the messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein expression of HMGB1 and RAGE, respectively. ResultsWeight gain of the rats in the hyperoxia group was significantly slower than that in the control group and intervention group (p<0.05). HE staining results showed lung tissues in the hyperoxia group were severely damaged compared with control group. W/D ratio in hyperoxia group was significantly higher than that in control group and intervention group (p<0.05). Protein and mRNA expression of HMGB1 and RAGE in the hyperoxia group were significantly higher than control group and intervention group (p<0.05). ConclusionHMGB1 and RAGE were involved in the pathogenesis of hyperoxia-induced lung injury, inhalation of NAC might alleviate hyperoxia-induced lung injury by regulating the expression of HMGB1 and RAGE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据