4.7 Review

Contribution of regulatory T cells to cancer: A review

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 234, 期 6, 页码 7983-7993

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.27553

关键词

cancer cell; cyclooxygenase-2; forkhead box P3; immunosuppression; PD-1; regulatory T cell; signal transducer and activator of transcription; transforming growth factor-beta; tumor microenvironment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) represent a low number of T-cell population under normal conditions, and they play key roles for maintaining immune system in homeostasis. The number of these cells is extensively increased in nearly all cancers, which is for dampening responses from immune system against cancer cells, metastasis, tumor recurrence, and treatment resistance. The interesting point is that apoptotic Tregs are stronger than their live counterparts for suppressing responses from immune system. Tregs within the tumor microenvironment have extensive positive cross-talks with other immunosuppressive cells including cancer-associated fibroblasts, cancer cells, macrophage type 2 cells, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and they have negative interactions with immunostimulatory cells including cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) and natural killer cells. A wide variety of markers are expressed in Tregs, among them forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) is the most specific marker and the master regulator of these cells. Multiple signals are activated by Tregs including transforming growth factor-beta, signal transducer and activator of transcription, and mTORC1. Treg reprogramming from an immunosuppressive to immunostimulatory proinflammatory phenotype is critical for increasing the efficacy of immunotherapy. This would be applicable through selective suppression of tumor-bearing receptors in Tregs, including FOXP3, programmed death-1, T-cell immunoglobulin mucin-3, and CTL-associated antigen-4, among others. Intratumoral Tregs can also be targeted by increasing the ratio for CTL/Treg.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据