4.6 Article

Perilaldehyde activates AMP-activated protein kinase to suppress the growth of gastric cancer via induction of autophagy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 120, 期 2, 页码 1716-1725

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.27491

关键词

AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK); autophagy; gastric cancer; perilaldehyde (PAH)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81770576]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Aim: Perillaldehyde (PAH), one of the major oil components in Perilla frutescens, is very critical to health maintenance, for a wide range of human chronic diseases, including cancers. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) has been implicated in the activation of autophagy in distinct tissues. This study was designed to explore whether PAH prevents gastric cancer growth and to investigate the molecular mechanism. Methods and Results: In cultured mouse gastric cancer cell line MFCs and human gastric cancer cell lines GC9811-P, PAH activated AMPK by increasing the Thr172 phosphorylation and activity in a time-/concentration-dependent manner. Furthermore, incubation of MFCs with PAH also increased autophagy as determined by monodansylcadaverine (MDC) staining, which was reversed by AMPK inhibitor compound C. PAH further decreased MFCs cell survival, which was abolished by compound C or autophagy inhibitor 3-Methyladenine (3-MA). In vivo studies indicated that 4-week administration of PAH (100mg/kg/day) suppressed the growth of gastric cancer and increased the levels of autophagy-related proteins, including beclin-1, LC3-II, cathepsin, caspase-3, p53, and cathepsin in tumors isolated from the xenograft model of gastric cancer in mice. Moreover, these anticancer effects produced by PAH were abolished by coadministration of compound C or 3-MA in vivo. Conclusions: PAH increases AMPK phosphorylation and activity to induce gastric cancer cell autophagy to inhibit the growth of gastric cancer. In perspective, therapy of PAH should be applied to treat patients with gastric cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据