4.5 Article

Evodiamine inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis and prevents ovariectomy-induced bone loss in mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 522-534

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13955

关键词

Ca2+ oscillation; evodiamine; NF-kappa B; osteoclast; osteoporosis; ovariectomy

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province [2015GXNSFDA139019]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81871806]
  3. Australian Health and Medical Research Council [11027932, 1107828]
  4. Western Australia Medical & Health Research Infrastructure Fund
  5. Arthritis Australia Foundation
  6. University of Western Australia (UWA) Research Collaboration Awards
  7. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1107828] Funding Source: NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) is a progressive bone disease characterized by the over-production and activation of osteoclasts in elderly women. In our study, we investigated the anti-osteoclastogenic effect of evodiamine (EVO) in vivo and in vitro, as well as the underlying mechanism. By using an in vitro bone marrow macrophage (BMM)-derived osteoclast culture system, we found that EVO inhibited osteoclast formation, hydroxyapatite resorption and receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand (RANKL)-induced osteoclast marker gene and protein expression. Mechanistically, we found that EVO inhibited the degradation and RANKL-induced transcriptional activity of I kappa B alpha. RANKL-induced Ca2+ oscillations were also abrogated by EVO. In vivo, an ovariectomized (OVX) mouse model was established to mimic PMO, and OVX mice received oral administration of either EVO (10 mg/kg) or saline every other day. We found that EVO can attenuate bone loss in OVX mice by inhibiting osteoclastogenesis. Taken together, our findings suggest that EVO suppresses RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis through NF-kappa B and calcium signalling pathways and has potential value as a therapeutic agent for PMO.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据