4.5 Review

Putting VE-cadherin into JAIL for junction remodeling

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 132, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.222893

关键词

Arp2/3 complex; Junction associated intermittent lamellipodia; Junction dynamics; Subcellular regulation; Endothelial cell

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [INST 2105/24-1, SCHN 430/6-2]
  2. Excellence Cluster Cells In Motion (CIM)
  3. Westfalische Wilhelms-Universitat Munster flexible fund [FF-2014-15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Junction dynamics of endothelial cells are based on the integration of signal transduction, cytoskeletal remodeling and contraction, which are necessary for the formation and maintenance of monolayer integrity, but also enable repair and regeneration. The VE-cadherin-catenin complex forms the molecular basis of the adherence junctions and cooperates closely with actin filaments. Several groups have recently described small actin-driven protrusions at the cell junctions that are controlled by the Arp2/3 complex, contributing to cell junction regulation. We identified these protrusions as the driving force for VE-cadherin dynamics, as they directly induce new VE-cadherin-mediated adhesion sites, and have accordingly referred to these structures as junction-associated intermittent lamellipodia (JAIL). JAIL extend over only a few microns and thus provide the basis for a subcellular regulation of adhesion. The local (subcellular) VE-cadherin concentration and JAIL formation are directly interdependent, which enables autoregulation. Therefore, this mechanism can contribute a subcellularly regulated adaptation of cell contact dynamics, and is therefore of great importance for monolayer integrity and relative cell migration during wound healing and angiogenesis, as well as for inflammatory responses. In this Review, we discuss the mechanisms and functions underlying these actin-driven protrusions and consider their contribution to the dynamic regulation of endothelial cell junctions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据