4.7 Article

How does the novel T315L mutation of breakpoint cluster region-abelson (BCR-ABL) kinase confer resistance to ponatinib: a comparative molecular dynamics simulation study

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2019.1567390

关键词

Acute lymphocytic leukemia; BCR-ABL; tyrosine kinase inhibitors; ponatinib; drug resistance; molecular dynamics simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) is one of the most dangerous types of leukemia, and about 40% of them is Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphocytic leukemia (Ph + ALL). Ph + ALL is caused by the fusion of the breakpoint cluster region (BCR) and the Ableson (ABL) genes, named the BCR-ABL fused gene that codes for an autonomously active tyrosine kinase. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are among the first-line therapeutic agents for the treatment of Ph + ALL. Drug resistance are the major obstacle, limiting their clinical utility. The latest third-generation TKIs, ponatinib, can tackle most abnormal BCR-ABL kinases, including the T315I mutant that is resistant to first- and second-generations TKIs such as imatinib. However, drug resistance still emerges with the novel T315L mutation and the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Here, using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we explored into the detailed interactions between ponatinib and BCR-ABL in the wild-type (WT), T315I, and T315L systems. The simulations revealed the significant conformational changes of ponatinib in its binding site due to the T315L mutation and the underlying structural mechanisms. Binding free energy analysis unveiled that the affinity of ponatinib to BCR-ABL decreased upon T315L mutation, which resulted in its unfavorable binding and drug resistance. Key residues responsible for the unfavored unbinding were also identified. This study elucidates the detailed mechanisms for the resistance of ponatinib in Ph + ALL triggered by the T315L mutation and will provide insights for future drug development and optimization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据