4.5 Article

Photoacoustic response induced by nanoparticle-mediated photothermal bubbles beyond the thermal expansion for potential theranostics

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS
卷 23, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.23.12.125002

关键词

photoacoustic signal; plasmonic nanoparticle; vaporization; theranostics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [61335012, 61727823, 61575156, 61705177, 61775178, 61505159]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photoacoustic responses induced by laser-excited photothermal bubbles (PTBs) in colloidal gold solutions are relevant to the theranostics quality in biomedical applications. Confined to the complexity of nonstationary, multiscale events, and multiphysical parameters of PTBs, systematic studies of the photoacoustic effects remain obscure. Photoacoustic effects mediated by PTB dynamics and a physical mechanism are studied based on a proof-of-principle multimodal platform integrating side-scattering imaging, time-resolved optical response, and acoustic detection. Results show excitation energy, nanoparticle (NP) size, and NP concentration have strong influence on photoacoustic responses. Under the characteristic enhancement regime, the photoacoustic signal amplitude increases linearly with excitation energy and increases quadratically with the NP diameter. As for the effects of the NP concentration (characterized by absorption coefficient), a higher photoacoustic signal amplitude is generally induced by a dense NP distribution. However, with an increase in the NP size, the shielding effect of NP swarm prevents the increase of photoacoustic responses. This study presents experimental evidence of some key physical phenomena governing the PTB-induced photoacoustic signal generation in gold NP suspensions, which may help enrich theranostic approaches in clinical applications by rationalizing operation parameters. (c) The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据