4.4 Article

Polymeric ionically conductive composite matrices and electrical stimulation strategies for nerve regeneration: In vitro characterization

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34272

关键词

nerve regeneration; electrical stimulation; ionic conductivity; micro-nanofiber; scaffold

资金

  1. Connecticut Regenerative Medicine Research Fund [15-RMBUCHC-08]
  2. Division of Graduate Education [DGE-1747453]
  3. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering [R01EB020640]
  4. National Science Foundation [EFRI-1332329]
  5. U.S. Department of Defense [OR120140]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stem cell strategies and the use of electrical stimulation (ES) represent promising new frontiers for peripheral nerve regeneration. Composite matrices were fabricated by coating electrospun polycaprolactone/cellulose acetate micronanofibers with chitosan and ionically conductive (IC) polymers including, sulfonated polyaniline, and lignin sulfonate. These composite matrices were characterized for surface morphology, coating uniformity, ionic conductivity, and mechanical strength to explore as scaffold materials for nerve regeneration in conjunction with ES. Composite matrices measured conductivity in the range of 0.0049-0.0068 mS/m due to the uniform coating of sulfonated polymers on the micro-nanofibers. Thin films (2D) and composite fiber matrices (3D) of IC polymers seeded with human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) were electrically stimulated at 0.5 V, 20 Hz for 1 h daily for 14 days to study the changes in cell viability, morphology, and expression of the neuronal-like phenotype. In vitro ES lead to changes in hMSCs' fibroblast morphology into elongated neurite-like structures with cell bodies for ES-treated and positive control growth factor-treated groups. Immunofluorescent staining revealed the presence of neuronal markers including beta 3-tubulin, microtubule-associated protein 2, and nestin in response to ES. (C) 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据