4.5 Article

The relationship between whole bone stiffness and strength is age and sex dependent

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 83, 期 -, 页码 125-133

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.11.030

关键词

Bone; Biomechanics; Aging; Men; Women; Strength; Sexual dimorphism

资金

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [AR065424, AR069620, DE007057, T32DE007057, DE00705, AR06424]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurately estimating whole bone strength is critical for identifying individuals that may benefit from prophylactic treatments aimed at reducing fracture risk. Strength is often estimated from stiffness, but it is not known whether the relationship between stiffness and strength varies with age and sex. Cadaveric proximal femurs (44 Male: 18-78 years; 40 Female: 24-95 years) and radial (36 Male: 18-89 years; 19 Female: 24-95 years) and femoral diaphyses (34 Male: 18-89 years; 19 Female: 24-95 years) were loaded to failure to evaluate how the stiffness-strength relationship varies with age and sex. Strength correlated significantly with stiffness at all sites and for both sexes, as expected. However, females exhibited significantly less strength for the proximal femur (58% difference, p < 0.001). Multivariate regressions revealed that stiffness, age and PYD were significant negative independent predictors of strength for the proximal femur (Age: M: p = 0.005, F: p < 0.001, PYD: M: p = 0.022, F: p = 0.025), radial diaphysis (Age: M = 0.055, PYD: F = 0.024), and femoral diaphysis (Age: M: p = 0.014, F: p = 0.097, PYD: M: p = 0.003, F: p = 0.091). These results indicated that older bones tended to be significantly weaker for a given stiffness than younger bones. These results suggested that human bones exhibit diminishing strength relative to stiffness with aging and with decreasing PYD. Incorporating these age- and sex-specific factors may help to improve the accuracy of strength estimates. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据