4.3 Article

Dimensions of Impulsivity in Healthy People, Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder, and Patients with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

期刊

JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 584-595

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1087054718822121

关键词

impulsivity; confirmatory factor analysis; latent factor model; borderline personality disorder; ADHD

资金

  1. Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic [15-30062A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study uses confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to establish a model with three self-reported and three behavioral latent variables, examining impulsivity dimensions. The results show that both patient groups scored higher in self-reported dimensions and impulsive choice, with only ADHD patients displaying impaired waiting and stopping impulsivity.
Objective: Impulsivity, observed in patients with various psychiatric disorders, is a heterogeneous construct with different behavioral manifestations. Through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), this study tests hypotheses about relationships between dimensions of impulsivity measured using personality questionnaires and behavioral tests. Method: The study included 200 healthy people, 40 patients with borderline personality disorder, and 26 patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) who underwent a comprehensive impulsivity test battery including the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS), UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale, a Go-NoGo task, a stop-signal task, and a delay discounting task. Results: A CFA model comprising three self-reported and three behavioral latent variables reached a good fit. Both patient groups scored higher in the self-reported dimensions and impulsive choice; only the ADHD patients displayed impaired waiting and stopping impulsivity. Conclusions: Using the developed CFA model, it is possible to describe relations between impulsivity dimensions and show different impulsivity patterns in patient populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据