4.5 Article

Effects of co-exposure of lipopolysaccharide and β-glucan (Zymosan A) in exacerbating murine allergic asthma associated with Asian sand dust

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED TOXICOLOGY
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 672-684

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jat.3759

关键词

Asian sand dust; eosinophil; lipopolysaccharide; neutrophil; ovalbumin; beta-glucan (Zymosan A)

资金

  1. Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan [5-1457]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During the 2000s, Asian sand dust (ASD) was implicated in the increasing prevalence of respiratory disorders, including asthma. We previously demonstrated that a fungus from ASD aerosol exacerbated ovalbumin (OVA)-induced airways inflammation. Exposure to heat-inactivated ASD (H-ASD) and either Zymosan A (ZymA, containing beta-glucan) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) exacerbated allergic airways inflammation in a mouse model, but the effects of co-exposure of LPS and beta-glucan are unclear. We investigated the effects of co-exposure of LPS and ZymA in OVA-induced allergic airways inflammation with ASD using BALB/c mice. Exposure to OVA + LPS enhanced the recruitment of inflammatory cells to the lungs, particularly neutrophils; exposure to OVA + LPS + H-ASD potentiated this effect. Exposure to OVA + ZymA + H-ASD stimulated the recruitment of inflammatory cells to the lungs, particularly eosinophils, and serum levels of OVA-specific IgE and IgG1 antibodies, whereas exposure to OVA + ZymA did not affect most indicators of lung inflammation. Although exposure to OVA + LPS + ZymA + H-ASD affected a few allergic parameters additively or synergistically, most allergic parameters in this group indicated the same level of exposure to OVA + LPS + H-ASD or OVA + ZymA + H-ASD. These results suggest that LPS and ZymA play different roles in allergic airways inflammation with ASD; LPS mainly enhances neutrophil recruitment through H-ASD, and ZymA enhances eosinophil recruitment through H-ASD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据