4.7 Article

Pressure effects on the structural and superconducting transitions in La3Co4Sn13

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 773, 期 -, 页码 34-39

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.236

关键词

Pressure effects; La3Co4Sn13; Superconductivity; Electrical resistivity; Synchrotron x-ray diffraction

资金

  1. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) [E-26/010.001045/2015]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvlovimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [400633/2016-7]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2011/19924-2, 2012/04870-7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

La3Co4Sn13 is a superconducting material with transition temperature at T-c = 2.70 K, which presents a superlattice structural transition at T* similar or equal to 150 K, a common feature for this class of compounds. However, for this material, it is not clear that at T' the lattice distortions arise from a charge density wave (CDW) or from a distinct microscopic origin. Interestingly, it has been suggested in isostructural non-magnetic intermetallic compounds that T* can be suppressed to zero temperature, by combining chemical and external pressure, and a quantum critical point is argued to be observed near these critical doping/pressure. Our study shows that application of pressure on single-crystalline La3Co4Sn13 enhances T-c and decreases T*. We observe thermal hysteresis loops for cooling/heating cycles around T* for P greater than or similar to 0.6 GPa, in electrical resistivity measurements, which are not seen in x-ray diffraction data. The hysteresis in electrical measurements may be due to the pinning of the CDW phase to impurities/defects, while the superlattice structural transition maintains its ambient pressure second-order transition nature under pressure. From our experiments we estimate that T* vanishes at around 5.5 GPa, though no quantum critical behavior is observed up to 2.53 GPa. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据