4.6 Article

Use of Dual-Layered Stents in Endovascular Treatment of Extracranial Stenosis of the Internal Carotid Artery Results of a Patient-Based Meta-Analysis of 4 Clinical Studies

期刊

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
卷 11, 期 23, 页码 2405-2411

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.06.047

关键词

carotid artery disease; carotid artery stenting; stroke

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of dual-layered mesh-covered carotid stent systems (DLS) for carotid artery stenting (CAS). BACKGROUND The need to minimize the risk for plaque debris prolapsing between stent struts following CAS has resulted in the development of DLS. Small clinical studies evaluating 2 available devices, Roadsaver and CGuard, have been recently published; none of these studies is sufficiently powered to test the role of common risk factors on the occurrence of stroke at 30 days post-CAS. METHODS A search was performed of multiple electronic databases for studies larger than 100 cases of CAS with DLS. Four single-arm prospective studies were identified, and individual patient data were collected. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of stroke at 30 days; secondary endpoints were technical and procedural success, periprocedural stroke, and in-hospital and 30-day rates of death. RESULTS The Roadsaver and CGuard stents were used in similar proportions, and technical success was achieved in all procedures (100% [n = 556]). There were 6 periprocedural strokes (1.08%; all minor). During 30-day follow-up, there was 1 death (0.17%) from myocardial infarction and 1 additional minor stroke (0.17%). The cumulative 30-day mortality rate was 0.17%, and the incidence of stroke at 30 days was 1.25%. No predictors of stroke at 30 days could be identified. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis suggests that DLS can be safely used for CAS, and their use minimizes the incremental risk related to symptomatic status and other risk factors. (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2018;11:2405-11) (c) 2018 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据