4.7 Article

Batting an in-flight object to the target

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 451-485

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0278364918817116

关键词

Batting; impact; impact planning; manipulator kinematics; trajectory planning; projectile flight mechanics; motion estimation

类别

资金

  1. Iowa State University (ISU)
  2. National Science Foundation [IIS-1421034]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Striking a flying object such as a ball to some target location is a highly skillful maneuver that a human being has to learn through a great deal of practice. In robotic manipulation, precision batting remains one of the most challenging tasks in which computer vision, modeling, planning, control, and action must be tightly coordinated in a split second. This paper investigates the problem of a two-degree-of-freedom robotic arm intercepting an object in free flight and redirecting it to some target with a single strike, assuming all the movements take place in one vertical plane. Two-dimensional impact is solved under Coulomb friction and energy-based restitution with a proof of termination. Planning combines impact dynamics and projectile flight mechanics with manipulator kinematics and image-based motion estimation. As the object is on the incoming flight, the post-impact task constraint of reaching the target is propagated backward in time, while the arm's kinematic constraints are propagated forward (via joint trajectory interpolation), all to the pre-impact instant when they will meet constraints that allow batting to happen. All the constraints (16 in total) are then exerted on the arm's pre-impact joint angles and velocities, which are repeatedly planned based on updated estimates of the object's motion captured by a high-speed camera. The arm keeps adjusting its motion in sync with planning until batting takes place. Experiments have demonstrated a better batting performance by a Barrett Technology WAM Arm than by a human being without training.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据