4.6 Article

What role do family composition and functioning play in emotional and behavioural problems among adolescent boys and girls?

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 64, 期 2, 页码 209-217

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00038-018-1171-x

关键词

Adolescence; Family composition; Family support; Family communication; Emotional and behavioural problems; Gender

资金

  1. Research and Development Support Agency [APVV-15-0012]
  2. Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic
  3. Slovak Academy of Sciences [1/0981/15]
  4. Internal Grant Agency of Czech Ministry of Health [IGA_CMTF_2018_006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesThe aim was to explore the associations of family composition, family support and communication with emotional and behavioural problems among adolescents as well as a possible moderating effect of gender on these associations.MethodsData from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study conducted in 2014 in Slovakia were used. The final sample consisted of 2908 students (mean age 14.36; 49.7% boys). We explored the association using generalized linear models.ResultsWe found that non-intact family was significantly associated with a higher score in emotional and behavioural problems. Family support and communication were found to be significantly associated with a lower score in emotional and behavioural problems. Significant interactions of gender and family communication with emotional and behavioural problems were found, showing that family communication decreased emotional and behavioural problems only in girls.ConclusionsFamily composition, family support and communication play an important role in the occurrence of emotional and behavioural problems in adolescence. Family communication lowers these problems only in girls. Prevention and intervention programmes could be focused on parent-child communication strategies with the importance of differences in the needs of boys and girls.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据