4.7 Article

The impact of camptothecin-encapsulated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles on the activity of cytochrome P450 in vitro

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOMEDICINE
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 383-391

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S188984

关键词

camptothecin; cytochrome P450; nanoparticle; drug delivery

资金

  1. Doctoral Foundation of Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital [B1205]
  2. Tianjin Key Project in the Health Sector [14KG140]
  3. National Clinical Research Center for Cancer Cultivation Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) has emerged as a promising anticancer drug delivery scaffold. Camptothecin (CPT) has been fabricated into a variety of nano-sized formulations to improve drug action. We report an experimental study on the effect of CPT-encapsulated PLGA (PLGA-CPT) nanoparticles (NPs) on drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450 enzyme, CYP3A4. Materials and methods: PLGA-CPT NPs were prepared by a single emulsion-solvent evaporation method. Results: Transmission electron micrography showed that the NPs had a round and regular shape with a mean diameter of 94.6 +/- 5.7 nm. An in vitro drug release study showed that CPT was continuously released for 48 h. PLGA-CPTNPs showed greater cytotoxic effects on the HepG2 cell line compared with an equal dose of free CPT. Correlation with 4-h uptake data suggested that this was due to a higher cellular uptake amount of CPT from PLGA-CPT NPs than from free CPT. PLGA-CPT NPs tended to inhibit CYP3A4 activity isolated from HepG2 cells. However, PLGA-CPT NPs had no effect on the CYP3A4 mRNA levels. Furthermore, the interaction between PLGA-CPT NPs and CYP3A4 was investigated by ultraviolet visible absorption spectroscopy and fluorescence spectroscopy. Conclusion: Taken together, the results demonstrate that CYP3A4 may be inhibited by PLGA-CPT NPs and interference with biotransformation should be considered when using NPs as drug delivery vesicles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据