4.5 Article

Numerical investigation of the aerodynamic breakup of droplets in tandem

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 289-303

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.10.015

关键词

Chain droplet breakup; Diesel; Drag coefficient; Breakup time; Critical we

资金

  1. MSCA -ITN-ETN of the European Union's H2020 programme (Greece), under REA [675676]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present work examines the aerodynamic breakup of four liquid droplets in tandem formation at Diesel engine conditions using the Volume of Fluid (VOF) method. The examined Weber (We) numbers range from 15 up to 64 and the non-dimensional distances between the droplet centres (L/D-0) vary from 1.25 up to 20. Focus is given on the breakup process of the third droplet of the row, which is regarded as a representative chain droplet; its development is compared against that of an isolated droplet at the same flow conditions. It is found that for small distances and depending on the We number, the obtained shapes and breakup modes between the droplets are different, with the representative chain droplet experiencing a new breakup mode in the multi-mode regime, termed as shuttlecock. This is characterized by an oblique peripheral stretching of the droplet caused by the acting of pressure forces at an off-centre region. Moreover, the drag coefficient and liquid surface area of the representative chain droplet are lower than the corresponding ones of the isolated droplet, while the breakup initiation time is longer and the minimum We number required for breakup (critical We) is higher; correlations are provided to quantify the effect of droplet distance on the aforementioned quantities. Generally, the droplet proximity becomes important for L/D-0 <9. Finally, the predicted drag coefficient is utilised in a simplified 0-D model that is capable of estimating the temporal evolution of droplet velocity of the representative chain droplet. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据