4.7 Article

Exploring Novel Functions of the Small GTPase Ypt1p under Heat-Shock by Characterizing a Temperature-Sensitive Mutant Yeast Strain, ypt1-G80D

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms20010132

关键词

small GTPase; heat-shock; molecular chaperone; structural change; functional switch

资金

  1. NG-BioGreen 21 Program (SSAC) [PJ01317301, PJ01334001]
  2. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation - MOEST, Korea [2016R1D1A1B01016551]
  3. RDA
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1D1A1B01016551] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In our previous study, we found that Ypt1p, a Rab family small GTPase protein, exhibits a stress-driven structural and functional switch from a GTPase to a molecular chaperone, and mediates thermo tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In the current study, we focused on the temperature-sensitive ypt1-G80D mutant, and found that the mutant cells are highly sensitive to heat-shock, due to a deficiency in the chaperone function of Ypt1p(G80D). This defect results from an inability of the protein to form high molecular weight polymers, even though it retains almost normal GTPase function. The heat-stress sensitivity of ypt1-G80D cells was partially recovered by treatment with 4-phenylbutyric acid, a chemical chaperone. These findings indicate that loss of the chaperone function of Ypt1p(G80D) underlies the heat sensitivity of ypt1-G80D cells. We also compared the proteomes of YPT1 (wild-type) and ypt1-G80D cells to investigate Ypt1p-controlled proteins under heat-stress conditions. Our findings suggest that Ypt1p controls an abundance of proteins involved in metabolism, protein synthesis, cellular energy generation, stress response, and DNA regulation. Finally, we suggest that Ypt1p essentially regulates fundamental cellular processes under heat-stress conditions by acting as a molecular chaperone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据