4.7 Article

Differential Exosomic Proteomic Patterns and Their Influence in Resveratrol Sensitivities of Glioblastoma Cells

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms20010191

关键词

glioblastoma cells; resveratrol; exosome; proteomics; drug sensitivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81450016, 81272786, 81071971, 81072063, 30971038]
  2. Special Research Fund for Emerging Subjects from South China University of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the commonest primary brain malignancy with extremely poor prognosis. Resveratrol posseses anti-cancer effects, while GBM cells respond differently to it due to certain unknown reason(s). Because the tumor-derived exosomes are supposed to influence chemosensitivity, the exosomic proteins released from resveratrol-sensitive U251 and resveratrol-resistant glioblastoma LN428 cells are profiled before (N/Exo) and after drug treatment (Res/Exo) by label-free liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The therapeutic implications of the proteomic findings are estimated by gene ontology enrichment analysis (GO) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG)-based bioinformatic analyses and further elucidated by exosome co-incubating. The results reveal that U251/N/Exo but not U251/Res/Exo enhances resveratrol sensitivity of resveratrol-resistant LN428 cells. The resveratrol sensitive properties of U251 cells are not altered by either LN428/N/Exo or LN428/Res/Exo. U251/N/Exo contains higher levels of chromatin silencing and epidermis development proteins, while U251/Res/Exo has more oxygen transport and G protein-coupled receptor. Both of LN428/N/Exo and LN428/Res/Exo are rich in the proteins related with nucleosome assembly, microtubule-based process and chromatin silencing. In conclusion, U251/N/Exo sensitizes LN428 cells to resveratrol via delivering drug sensitizing signals, suggesting the presence of additional factor(s) that may determine the resveratrol sensitivities of glioblastoma cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据