4.3 Article

An evaluation of Rb-Sr isotope dilution analyses with a 86Sr-enriched tracer and Multiple Collection-ICP-MS

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 435, 期 -, 页码 234-240

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2018.10.035

关键词

Chromatography; Rb-(SrSr)-Sr-86-enriched tracer; Isotope dilution; Mass spectrometry

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO)
  2. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional [CGL2015-63530-P]
  3. Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea UPV/EHU (Grupo Consolidado project) [GIU15/05]
  4. European funding (ERDF)
  5. European funding (ESF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A straightforward method is described allowing to determine on a routine basis Rb and Sr concentrations and Rb-87/Sr-86 isotope by using the isotope dilution method with isotopic tracers enriched in Rb-87 and in( 86)Sr, respectively, and MC-ICP-MS for mass spectrometric measurements. The Sr-87/Sr-86 isotope ratios are measured separately on unspiked sample aliquots, thereby alleviating the need for correcting the contribution that would arise in case of total spiking with an Sr-84 enriched tracer. The sample preparation involves sample dissolution with hydrofluoric acid, and the separation of Rb and Sr from matrix elements and from each other by combining extraction chromatography and cation exchange in nitric acid medium. The concentration and Rb-87/Sr-86 data measured on replicate dissolutions of several international geostandards display the very good reproducibility typical of the isotope dilution method, even at low analyte concentration. The within-run precisions of Sr-87/Sr-86 isotope ratios (2 S.E. from 1 10(-5) to 3 10(-5)) are not as good as those typically achieved by TIMS, but the data show a good reproducibility (0.002% RSD) and are accurate, based on their fair agreement with recommended values. However, these figures are significantly worse at low Sr concentration, indicating that Sr-87/Sr-86 ratios should preferably be measured by TIMS when Sr-poor samples are processed. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据