4.7 Review

Hydrogen from hydrogen sulfide: towards a more sustainable hydrogen economy

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 1299-1327

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.035

关键词

Hydrogen sulfide; Hydrogen production; H2S decomposition; Oil sands; Petroleum upgrading; H2S utilization

资金

  1. Government of Canada's interdepartmental Program of Research and Development (PERD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The decomposition of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) with simultaneous hydrogen (H-2) generation offers a sustainable energy production option and an environmental pollution abatement strategy. H2S is both naturally occurring and human-made. In the future, H2S production is expected to increase due to increased heavy oil refining. Currently, H2S is largely converted to sulfur and water using industrial processes such as the Claus process, however, it would be more useful and economical to convert H2S to sulfur and H-2 instead. H-2 currently comes from the steam reforming of natural gas, which is an energy-intensive process. Because H-2 is a valued commodity and global consumption is expected to increase, alternative sources of H-2 and hydrogen conservation have become topics of active research. Alberta is an especially large consumer of H-2 due to its oil sands processing. H-2 from petroleum-based H2S sources could be reused in petroleum upgrading, as a partial replacement of steam methane reforming. This review paper highlights some of the methods of H2S utilization, such as partial oxidation, reformation and decomposition techniques and approaches that convert H2S to sulfur, water and, more importantly, H-2. To date, almost no technologies exist that are suitable for converting H2S to sulfur and H-2 for industrial-scale applications. Here, we survey the literature to identify the most promising approach. Crown Copyright (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据