4.7 Article

Bundle-shaped cobalt-nickel selenides as advanced electrocatalysts for water oxidation

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 44, 期 5, 页码 2868-2876

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.074

关键词

CoNi selenides; Oxygen evolution reaction; Oxygen vacancies; Electrocatalysts

资金

  1. Jiangsu province key R&D projects of China [BE2016648]
  2. Key University Science Research Project of Jiangsu Province [16KJA210001]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20171168]
  4. Science and Technology Project of Xuzhou [KC16SG246]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Searching for high-performance and earth-abundant electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is of paramount significance for overall water splitting to produce hydrogen. Herein, an advanced class of CoNi selenides containing rich oxygen vacancies, with a hierarchical bundle-like and holey nanosheets as noble-metal-free catalysts were first synthesized through a facile hydrothermal method. Benefitting from abundant oxygen vacancies, bundle-like nanostructure, as well as strong synergistic effects, such CoNi selenides demonstrate a greatly enhanced surface area to supply more electrocatalytic active sites to contact with electrolyte, accompanied by largely promoted reaction kinetics, which show outstanding electrocatalytic performances for OER. Remarkably, the optimal Co1Ni0.5Se can display outstanding OER activity with the small Tafel slope of 48 mV dec(-1) and low over potential of 250 mV (at 10 mA cm(-2)), which are much superior to those of Co/Ni-based catalysts. This electrocatalyst can also maintain high activity and structure stability during long-term electrolysis of 35 h, demonstrating a desirable electrocatalyst for OER. This work elucidates the sophisticated construction of well-defined non-noble metal catalysts for the practical applications in water oxidation. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据