4.7 Article

Semi-empirical model and experimental validation for the performance evaluation of a 15 kW alkaline water electrolyzer

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 43, 期 45, 页码 20332-20345

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.029

关键词

Hydrogen production; Alkaline water electrolysis; Mathematical model; Test bench; Gas purity; Sensitivity analysis

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad (MINECO, Spain)
  2. Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha (JCCM, Spain)
  3. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a semi-empirical mathematical model for predicting the electrochemical behavior of an alkaline water electrolysis system, based on the polarization curve and Faraday efficiency as a function of the current density under different operating conditions, such as, temperature and pressure. Also, the gas impurities of hydrogen in oxygen have been modeled for safety reasons due to its importance when the electrolyzer is dynamically operated using renewable energy sources. The different parameters defined in the model have been calculated by MATLAB, using a non-linear regression, on the basis of experimental data obtained in a 15 kW alkaline test bench. The simulated and measured values have been compared to ensure the accuracy and validity of the proposed model. In this sense, the error has been evaluated for the voltage with an average result of 5.67 mV per cell and for the Faraday efficiency and the gas impurities of hydrogen in oxygen with a value lower than 1%. These results show an excellent correlation between experimental and modeled data, so the model is a useful design and optimization tool for alkaline electrolyzers. Also, a sensitivity analysis has been used to determine the most influential operating variables in the performance of the electrolyzer. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据