4.7 Article

Experimental study on the energy conversion of food waste via supercritical water gasification: Improvement of hydrogen production

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 44, 期 10, 页码 4664-4673

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.193

关键词

Food waste; Supercritical water; Gasification; Hydrogen; Catalyst

资金

  1. National International Cooperation Project [2016YFE0202000, 2017YFE0107600]
  2. Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation Project [LY17E060005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the model food waste was gasified to hydrogen-rich syngas in a batch reactor under supercritical water condition. The model food consisted of rice, chicken, cabbage, and cooking oil. The effects of the main operating parameters including temperature (420-500 degrees C), residence time (20-60 min) and feedstock concentration (2-10 wt%) were investigated. Under the optimal condition at 500 degrees C, 2 wt% feedstock and 60 min residence time, the highest H-2 yield of 13.34 mol/kg and total gas yield of 28.27 mol/kg were obtained from non-catalytic experiments. In addition, four commercial catalysts namely FeCl3, K2CO3 , activated carbon, and KOH were employed to investigate the catalytic effect of additives at the optimal condition. The results showed that the highest hydrogen yield of 20.37 mol/kg with H-2 selectivity of 113.19%, and the total gas yield of 38.36 mol/kg were achieved with 5 wt% KOH addition Moreover, the low heating value of gas products from catalytic experiments with KOH increased by 32.21% compared to the non-catalytic experiment. The catalytic performance of the catalysts can be ranked in descending order as KOH > activated carbon > FeCl3 > K2CO3. The supercritical water gasification (SCWG) with KOH addition can be a potential applied technology for food waste treatment with production of hydrogen-rich gases. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据