期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 118-128出版社
ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.12.002
关键词
Experience sampling method; ESM; Ecological momentary assessment; EMA; Self-report; Smartphone; Contingency; Response rate; Accuracy; Mobile questionnaires; Data quality; Validation
资金
- Academy of Finland [276786-AWARE, 286386-CPDSS, 285459-iSCIENCE, 304925-CARE]
- European Commission [6AIKA-A71143-AKAI]
- Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions [645706-GRAGE]
The Experience Sampling Method is widely used to collect human labelled data in the wild. Using this methodology, study participants repeatedly answer a set of questions, constructing a rich overview of the studied phenomena. One of the methodological decisions faced by researchers is deciding on the question scheduling. The literature defines three distinct schedule types: randomised, interval-based, or event-based (in our case, smartphone unlock). However, little evidence exists regarding the side-effects of these schedules on response rate and recall accuracy, and how they may bias study findings. We evaluate the effect of these three contingency configurations in a 3-week within-subjects study (N = 20). Participants answered various objective questions regarding their phone usage, while we simultaneously establish a ground-truth through smartphone instrumentation. We find that scheduling questions on phone unlock yields a higher response rate and accuracy. Our study provides empirical evidence for the effects of notification scheduling on participant responses, and informs researchers who conduct experience sampling studies on smartphones.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据