4.3 Article

The effects of intraoperative ICG fluorescence angiography in laparoscopic low anterior resection: a propensity score-matched study

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 394-402

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10147-018-1365-5

关键词

Rectal cancer; ICG angiography; Anastomotic leakage; Low anterior resection; A propensity score-matched study

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background It remains unclear whether indocyanine green (ICG) angiography could reduce the rate of postoperative anastomotic leakage (AL) following rectal surgery. The aim was to determine whether intraoperative ICG angiography could decrease symptomatic AL following laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR). Methods This is a retrospective study of 149 patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic LAR at a single institution. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to compare groups with and without ICG angiography. Results Before PSM, the symptomatic AL rate was 10.4% (5/48) in patients with ICG angiography, compared with 6.9% (7/101) in cases without ICG angiography (P=0.52). In patients with ICG angiography, poor perfusion of the proximal colon judged by ICG angiography led to additional colon resection in 27.1% (13/48). Symptomatic AL occurred in 30.8% (4/13) of the patients who had revision of the transection site, whereas it occurred in only 2.9% (1/35) of the patients who did not need revision of the transection site (P=0.015). After PSM, the symptomatic AL rate was 8.8% (3/34) in patients with ICG angiography, compared with 14.7% (5/34) in cases without ICG angiography (P=0.71). In univariate analysis, high BMI, preoperative chemotherapy, and lateral lymph node dissection were significantly associated with symptomatic AL. Multivariate analysis indicated that only lateral lymph node dissection remained significantly associated with AL (odds ratio, 10.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-58.61; P=0.011). Conclusions Intraoperative ICG angiography is useful for prediction of AL following laparoscopic LAR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据