4.6 Article

Dietary patterns, food groups, and incidence of aortic valve stenosis: A prospective cohort study

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 283, 期 -, 页码 184-188

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.11.007

关键词

Aortic valve stenosis; Diet; Dietary patterns; Foods; Prospective studies

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [2016-01042]
  2. Swedish Research Council [2016-01042] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The role of diet in the development of aortic valve stenosis (AVS) is unknown. We therefore examined the associations of two dietary patterns, including a modified Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (mDASH) diet and a modified Mediterranean (mMED) diet, and the food items included in these dietary patterns with incidence of aortic valve stenosis (AVS) in a population-based cohort study. Methods: The study cohort comprised 74,401 Swedish adults (54% men) who were free of cardiovascular disease at the time of completion of a baseline questionnaire about habitual diet and other risk factors for chronic diseases. Participants were followed-up through linkage with nationwide registers on hospitalization and causes of death. Results: During 1,132,617 person-years (mean 15.2 years) of follow-up, 1338 incident AVS cases (801 in men and 537 in women) were ascertained. We found no significant associations of the mDASH and mMED dietary patterns or the food groups and beverages included in these diets (i.e., fruit, vegetables, legumes and nuts, whole grains, fish, low-fat dairy foods, full-fat dairy foods, red and processed meat, and sweetened beverages) with risk of AVS. The hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of AVS per one standard deviation increase in the mDASH and mMED diet scores were respectively 1.02 (0.96-1.07) and 1.00 (0.95-1.06). Conclusion: This study found no evidence that diet plays a role in the development of AVS. (c) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据