4.7 Article

An analysis of a multiple biomarker panel to better predict prostate cancer metastasis after radical prostatectomy

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 144, 期 5, 页码 1151-1159

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31906

关键词

prostate cancer; biomarkers; AZGP1; Ki67; prognosis

类别

资金

  1. Australian Postgraduate Award
  2. Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre-NSW
  3. Cancer Institute NSW Translational Program Grant [10/TPG/1-04]
  4. NIH [5P30CA056036-17, 5R01CA176401-04]
  5. Australian Department of Health and Ageing
  6. University of Sydney
  7. Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia
  8. Ted Whitten Foundation
  9. RT Hall Foundation
  10. Cancer Institute NSW Translational Program
  11. National Health and Medical Research Council [535903]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A plethora of individual candidate biomarkers for predicting biochemical relapse in localized prostate cancer (PCa) have been proposed. Combined biomarkers may improve prognostication, and ensuring validation against more clinically relevant endpoints are required. The Australian PCa Research Centre NSW has contributed to numerous studies of molecular biomarkers associated with biochemical relapse. In the current study, these biomarkers were re-analyzed for biochemical relapse, metastatic relapse and PCa death with extended follow-up. Biomarkers of significance were then used to develop a combined prognostic model for clinical outcomes and validated in a large independent cohort. The discovery cohort (n = 324) was based on 12 biomarkers with a median follow-up of 16 years. Seven biomarkers were significantly associated with biochemical relapse. Three biomarkers were associated with metastases: AZGP1, Ki67 and PML. Only AZGP1 was associated with PCa death. In their individual and combinational forms, AZGP1 and Ki67 as a dual BM signature was the most robust predictor of metastatic relapse (AUC 0.762). The AZPG1 and Ki67 signature was validated in an independent cohort of 347 PCa patients. The dual BM signature of AZGP1 and Ki67 predicted metastasis in the univariable (HR 7.2, 95% CI, 1.6-32; p = 0.01) and multivariable analysis (HR 5.4, 95% CI, 1.2-25; p = 0.03). The dual biomarker signature marginally improved risk prediction compared to AZGP1 alone (AUC 0.758 versus 0.738, p < 0.001). Our findings indicate that biochemical relapse is not an adequate surrogate for metastasis or PCa death. The dual biomarker signature of AZGP1 and Ki67 offers a small benefit in predicting metastasis over AZGP1 alone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据