4.7 Article

Challenges in assessing the sunscreen-melanoma association

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 144, 期 11, 页码 2651-2668

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31997

关键词

sunscreen; melanoma; skin cancer; meta-analysis; sun protection

类别

资金

  1. FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions (FP7-PEOPLE-2013-COFUND) [609020]
  2. Kreftforeningen (Norwegian Cancer Society) [6823329, 2197685, 5829980]
  3. National Institutes of Health [CA198216]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Whether sunscreen use affects melanoma risk has been widely studied with contradictory results. To answer this question we performed a systematic review of all published studies, accounting for sources of heterogeneity and bias. We searched for original articles investigating the sunscreen-melanoma association in humans to February 28, 2018. We then used random-effects meta-analysis to combine estimates of the association, stratified by study design. Stratified meta-analysis and meta-regression were used to identify sources of heterogeneity. We included 21,069 melanoma cases from 28 studies published 1979-2018: 23 case-control (11 hospital-based, 12 population-based), 1 ecological, 3 cohort and 1 randomised controlled trial (RCT). There was marked heterogeneity across study designs and among case-control studies but adjustment for confounding by sun exposure, sunburns and phenotype systematically moved estimates toward decreased melanoma risk among sunscreen users. Ever- vs. never-use of sunscreen was inversely associated with melanoma in hospital-based case-control studies (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.57, 95%confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.87, p(heterogeneity) < 0.001), the ecological study (rate ratio = 0.48, 95%CI 0.35-0.66), and the RCT (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.49, 95%CI 0.24-1.01). It was not associated in population-based case-control studies (OR = 1.17, 95%CI 0.90-1.51, p(heterogeneity) < 0.001) and was positively associated in the cohort studies (HR = 1.27, 95%CI 1.07-1.51, p(heterogeneity) = 0.236). The association differed by latitude (p(interaction) = 0.042), region (p(interaction) = 0.008), adjustment for naevi/freckling (p(interaction) = 0.035), and proportion of never-sunscreen-users (p(interaction) = 0012). Evidence from observational studies on sunscreen use and melanoma risk was weak and heterogeneous, consistent with the challenges of controlling for innate confounding by indication. The only RCT showed a protective effect of sunscreen. What's new? Effectiveness of sunscreen in reducing UV-induced skin damage has been proven in experimental studies, but effectiveness in reducing melanoma in humans remains inconclusive. This is the first meta-analysis to analyze data from four study designs, stratify hospital- and population-based case-control studies, and include as many as five prospective studies. Evidence from observational studies on the sunscreen-melanoma association was heterogeneous, consistent with the challenges of controlling for innate confounding by indication. The only randomized controlled trial showed a protective effect. Public health recommendations should place greater emphasis on the proper use of sunscreen in conjunction with other means of sun protection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据