4.6 Article

Material extrusion-based additive manufacturing of structurally controlled poly(lactic acid)/carbon nanotube nanocomposites

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-03283-9

关键词

3D printing; PLA; CNT nanocomposites; Process parameters; Mechanical characterization

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [113M491]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mesostructure of additively manufactured nanocomposite parts can be tailored by the manipulation of process parameters to improve the properties of the final part. The effects of contributing process parameters and their interactions must be identified to be able to tune the properties of additively manufactured (3D-printed) nanocomposites based on their intended applications. Herein, we present the characterization of the effect of three major building parameters, namely layer thickness, infill percentage, and infill pattern, on mechanical and thermal properties of 3D-printed poly(lactic acid) (PLA)/carbon nanotube (CNT) nanocomposites. The characterization of printed parts showed that increasing layer thickness had a deteriorating effect on the mechanical properties regardless of the CNT concentration; however, the Young's modulus and tensile strength of parts were improved by increasing the CNT content in the same design of mesostructure. Moreover, the thermomechanical analysis showed that the residual thermal stresses of 3D-printed nanocomposites increased by increasing the layer thickness. Furthermore, it was shown that decreasing infill percentage resulted in a non-linear reduction of stiffness, strength, and dimensional stability. Moreover, a honeycomb-shaped infill pattern was introduced for the manufacturing of parts, which has shown more isotropic mechanical properties. The contributions of CNTs in enhancing mechanical properties of 3D-printed nanocomposites were investigated, by considering the induced reinforcing effects as well as the alteration of the crystallization behavior of PLA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据