4.6 Review

The effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in reducing the incidence and duration of delirium in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
卷 45, 期 1, 页码 1-12

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5452-x

关键词

Critical care; Delirium; Meta-analysis; Non-pharmacological interventions; Systematic review

资金

  1. Northern Ireland Health and Social Care research and development division
  2. Public Health Agency [EAT/5092/14]
  3. MRC [G0901530] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeTo evaluate the effect of non-pharmacological interventions versus standard care on incidence and duration of delirium in critically ill patients.MethodsWe searched electronic and grey literature for randomised clinical trials up to March 2018. Two reviewers independently screened, selected and extracted data. Meta-analysis was undertaken using random effects modelling.ResultsWe identified 15 trials (2812 participants). Eleven trials reported incidence of delirium. Pooled data from four trials of bright light therapy showed no significant effect between groups (n=829 participants, RR 0.45, 99% CI 0.10-2.13, P=0.19, very low quality evidence). Seven trials of various individual interventions also failed to report any significant effects. A total of eight trials reported duration of delirium. Pooled data from two trials of multicomponent physical therapy showed no significant effect [n=404 participants, MD (days) -0.65, 99% CI -2.73 to 1.44, P=0.42, low quality of evidence]. Four trials of various individual interventions also reported no significant effects. A trial of family voice reorientation showed a beneficial effect [n=30, MD (days) -1.30, 99% CI -2.41 to -0.19, P=0.003, very low quality evidence].ConclusionsCurrent evidence does not support the use of non-pharmacological interventions in reducing incidence and duration of delirium in critically ill patients. Future research should consider well-designed and well-described multicomponent interventions and include adequately defined outcome measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据