4.6 Article

Highly Sensitive Luminescent Probe of Aniline and Trace Water in Organic Solvents Based on Covalently Modified Lanthanide Metal-Organic Frameworks

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 57, 期 49, 页码 16564-16571

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b05068

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21571142]
  2. Developing Science Funds of Tongji University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel europium functionalized metal organic framework (MOF) named Eu3+@UiO-66-NH2-IM is robustly synthesized via covalent PSM (postsynthetic modification). The ligand of matrix MOF is covalently modified via imidazole-2-carboxaldehyde after the UiO-66-NH2 is synthesized. The successful transformation of amino groups to imine groups is confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR) analysis. The modified MOF named UiO-66-NH2-IM shows outstanding crystalline stability. After Eu3+ is doped into UiO-66-NH2-IM, the as-prepared fluorescent MOF displays the characteristic emission line of Eu3+. Discussion of the tunable emission color of the modified MOF is included, and white-light integration could be achieved through altering the ratio of Eu3+ doped into the MOF. In addition, the luminescent transparent film based on Eu3+@UiO-66-NH2-IM can emit white light under proper excitation wavelength, which may be helpful to some potential applications in lighting. In addition, Eu3+@UiO-66-NH2-IM shows a different emission response in water and organic solvents, and it is further developed into a sensitive probe for the detection of water content in organic solvents (ethanol, DMF) with low detection limits (0.088 and 0.054%, respectively) by utilizing its quenching behavior in water. Meanwhile, Eu3+@UiO-66-NH2-IM displays a greatly selective and sensitive response for detecting aniline with a low detection limit (0.072%) and a broad linear range (0-3.75%), and the signal of the detection is obvious, which can be seen clearly under the irradiation of UV light.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据