4.2 Article

Grazing intensity determines pasture spatial heterogeneity and productivity in an integrated crop-livestock system

期刊

GRASSLAND SCIENCE
卷 65, 期 1, 页码 49-59

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/grs.12209

关键词

conservation agriculture; geostatistics; mixed systems; sustainable intensification; sward height

资金

  1. Rio Grande do Sul Research Foundation (FAPERGS)
  2. Brazilian Research Agency (CAPES)
  3. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spatial heterogeneity is a property of natural ecosystems. Integrated crop-livestock systems (ICLS) aim to mimic natural ecosystem functions as pillars of sustainable intensification, and grazing is a process that potentially affects spatial heterogeneity. Then, we investigated the effect of different grazing intensities, defined according to a range of sward heights (intensive grazing, 10 cm; moderate grazing, 20 cm; moderate-light grazing, 30 cm; light grazing, 40 cm; and ungrazed), on the spatial heterogeneity and biomass productivity of mixed Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) and black oat (Avena strigosa Schreb.) pastures. The mixture was grazed by steers under continuous variable stocking, using put-and-take animals to maintain targeted sward heights. The pasture was in rotation with soybean in an integrated crop-livestock system for 15 years. Data concerns pasture phase on the 15th rotation cycle. Cattle grazing at moderate to light intensities increased pasture spatial heterogeneity and total aboveground primary productivity, while intensive grazing led to homogeneous overgrazed canopies with frequent bare soil patches. Pre-grazing sward structure suggests that the summer crop rotation buffers the contrasts created by grazing at different intensities. This study suggests that moderate to light grazing intensities increase pasture productive efficiency and create more heterogeneous canopies in ICLS, while intensive grazing should be avoided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据