4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Static and dynamic stiffness measurements with Opalinus Clay

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING
卷 67, 期 4, 页码 997-1019

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12720

关键词

Rock physics; Anisotropy; Elastics; Seismics

资金

  1. Joint Industry Project Shale Rock Physics' at SINTEF Petroleum Research - Research Council of Norway through the PETROMAKS 2 Programme [234074]
  2. BP
  3. DONG Energy
  4. Engie
  5. Maersk
  6. Total

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, an experimental study was carried out with the aim of reconciling static and dynamic stiffness of Opalinus Clay. The static and dynamic stiffness of core plugs from a shaly and a sandy facies of Opalinus Clay were characterized at two different stress states. The measurements included undrained quasi-static loading-unloading cycles from which the static stiffness was derived, dynamic stiffness measurement at seismic frequencies (0.5-150 Hz) and ultrasonic velocity measurements (500 kHz) probing the dynamic stiffness at ultrasonic frequencies. The experiments were carried out in a special triaxial low-frequency cell. The obtained results demonstrate that the difference between static and dynamic stiffness is due to both dispersion and non-elastic effects: Both sandy and shaly facies of Opalinus Clay exhibit large dispersion, that is, a large frequency dependence of dynamic stiffness and acoustic velocities. Especially dynamic Young's moduli exhibit very high dispersion; between seismic and ultrasonic frequencies they may change by more than a factor 2. P-wave velocities perpendicular to bedding are by more than 200 m/s higher at ultrasonic frequencies than at seismic frequencies. The static undrained stiffness of both sandy and shaly facies is strongly influenced by non-elastic effects, resulting in significant softening during both loading and unloading with increasing stress amplitude. The zero-stress extrapolated static undrained stiffness, however, reflects the purely elastic response and agrees well with the dynamic stiffness at seismic frequency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据