4.6 Article

River incision and migration deduced from 36Cl cosmic-ray exposure durations: The Clue de la Cerise gorge in southern French Alps

期刊

GEOMORPHOLOGY
卷 330, 期 -, 页码 81-88

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.01.011

关键词

River incision; Lateral migration; Late Quatemary; Southern French Alps

资金

  1. French CNRS INSU Syster and Aleas Research programs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We estimate recent (20 ka) incision and lateral migration rate on a spectacular similar to N-S striking gorge cross-cutting N-dipping limestones in a fold-and-thrust belt of the external Southern French Alps. Upstream of the gorge, the river makes a right angle turn and follows the limestone surface parallel to the bedding direction (similar to EW). Eighteen samples were gathered along two vertical river polished profiles and three others on the denuded north-dipping surface layer, in order to determine river incision and lateral migration timing and rates. Surface age exposures of polished river cliff and bedding surface have been obtained from Cl-36 cosmogenic nuclide dating and allow us to constrain the rate of vertical incision and of surface denudation of the Jurassic limestone layer. Fifteen Cl-36 exposure ages have been obtained and range from similar to 21 ka to similar to 3 ka. Samples clearly define two age/height linear trends, which slopes correspond to incision rates of 1 and 0.3 mm/yr, respectively. The transition from low to high incision rate occurs at about similar to 12 ka, i.e. during the Younger Dryas glacial phase. Data also indicate that the vertical incision of the N-S branch of the gorge is coeval with the lateral (northward) river migration of its E-W branch associated with the denudation of the limestones surface. Extrapolating incision rates deduced from Cl-36 exposure ages through time suggests that the incision of the Clue and denudation of the Jurassic limestones started about 500-600 ka ago. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据