4.5 Review

Suicidal ideation and behaviors among women veterans with recent exposure to intimate partner violence

期刊

GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 60-64

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.10.006

关键词

Suicide; Intimate partner violence; Social determinants; Veterans; Prevention; Women's health

资金

  1. Health Services Research and Development of the Office of Research and Development of the US Department of Veterans Affairs [IIR 15-142-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Women veterans have disproportionately high risk for both suicide and intimate partner violence compared to women non-veterans. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between intimate partner violence (IPV) and suicidal ideation and suicidal or self-harm behaviors among women veterans. Method: Veterans Health Administration (VHA) electronic medical records were extracted for 8427 women veterans who completed screening for past-year IPV between April 2014 and 2016. Risk for suicidal ideation and self-harm behaviors were estimated as function of screening results using logistic regression. Results: Overall, 8.4% screened positive for IPV. Suicidal ideation or self-harm behaviors were recorded for 3.2%. Positive IPV screen was associated with double the odds for suicidal ideation (AOR = 2.04; 95% CI = 1.47-2.86) and self-harm behaviors (AOR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.10-3.83). Risks did not significantly differ by IPV type. Suicide-related ICD codes were most often recorded prior to IPV screening. Conclusions: There is a strong association between positive IPV screen and suicidal ideation and self-harm behaviors among VHA-engaged women veterans. Documentation of either event is an important marker for the other. Integration of suicide prevention with IPV services may enhance identification of women at risk and speed service uptake. Suicidal ideation and behaviors should be assessed among women with positive IPV screens, and identification of suicide risk should trigger IPV assessment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据